Finding a Good DUI Lawyer On-Line is Tough

You cannot count on Google anymore. Google use to post the top DUI Lawyers by their proven content in their websites. The lawyer with the most useful and current information to the searcher ranked in the highest area to help the person in need of quality information. However, today, Google sells out for "Location over Quality". While it is true that Google continues to show and rank the quality information in the organic search, for more profit, Google has placed "Local Maps" at the top of the page which moves "Quality" to the bottom. So, the searcher now gets a lawyer that is closer who may have less experience without ever seeing the lawyer with years of success and experience just for speed sake of searching.
If you want the best, you must go to the organic search area and ignore the closest. Closest may be find for a fast pizza or quick shopping experience, but all doctors and lawyers who can impact your life dramatically for the rest of your life are not equal, so need to spend a little more time to go to the organic search area for the best. This is especially true when using a phone to search for a doctor or lawyer. I just looked up lawyers in Los Angeles, CA and found local listings showing over organic searches and then compared; no one wants to spend that much time, but the organic search revealed quality lawyers hidden at the bottom of the page, and Locals came up at the top, and some of them only had 3 years of experience. Don't let Google's blunder at to your troubles if you have a medical or legal problem. Look at the organic, and then send Google a message to keep the local stuff for fast food, not something that will effect the rest of your life.

Another Hollywood Star Over Charged

David Cassidy arrested in Florida for DUI. Cops say he swerved and failed field sobriety tests; there is a surprise. Just about every police report I have ever seen has the suspect swerving, and usually in a serpentine manner per training in the police academy, and fails the subjective (officer opinion) field sobriety tests. Then the press writes, and the star pled not guilty, of course. Now there is a fair and impartial reporter. Where are the videos of driving and field sobriety test? Where are the chemical results? I would like to thank the reporter for showing the rest of the country that he is not just looking to show-off by reporting with a slant to GUILT against another star before all the facts are in. Here is the biased story without the video of driving, or field sobriety tests, or chemical results. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/11/05/scandalous-male-star-s/#content
What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
number1duioffice.com